MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel SDN-enabled Edge Computing Load Balancing Scheme for IoT Video Analytics

2022· article· en· W4320029339 on OpenAlexafffund
Pouria Pourrashidi Shahrbabaki, Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho, Yousef R. Shayan

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceServerComputer networkEdge computingSoftware-defined networkingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionLatency (audio)Load balancing (electrical power)OpenFlowDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edge computing has been designed to deploy resources in the proximity of IoT devices, which reduces latency and network overhead. Nevertheless, resources on edge servers are limited and must efficiently be managed. In this paper, we propose a novel software-defined networking (SDN)-based scheme to balance the computation resource requests among a network of edge servers aimed at supporting IoT video analytics streaming applications. In the proposed solution, programmable switches periodically report the IoT video streaming workload forwarded to each edge server. This information is then used at the SDN controller to estimate the incoming and outgoing traffic load at edge servers and balance IoT video streaming among them, by updating routing tables at the programmable switches. The performance of the proposed solution is evaluated and compared to related schemes through extensive simulations using the Mininet emulator. Obtained results show that the proposed solution can reduce up to 21 % of average latency with 20 % load saving in each edge server, compared to deterministic and random-based related solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0090.008
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207