Hierarchical Deep Q-Learning Based Handover in Wireless Networks with Dual Connectivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5G New Radio proposes the usage of frequencies above 10 GHz to speed up LTE's existent maximum data rates. However, the effective size of 5G antennas and consequently its repercussions in the signal degradation in urban scenarios makes it a challenge to maintain stable coverage and connectivity. In order to obtain the best from both technologies, recent dual connectivity solutions have proved their capabilities to improve performance when compared with coexistent standalone 5G and 4G technologies. Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown its huge potential in wireless scenarios where parameter learning is required given the dynamic nature of such context. In this paper, we propose two reinforcement learning algorithms: a single agent RL algorithm named Clipped Double Q-Learning (CDQL) and a hierarchical Deep Q-Learning (HiDQL) to improve Multiple Radio Access Technology (multi-RAT) dual-connectivity handover. We compare our proposal with two baselines: a fixed parameter and a dynamic parameter solution. Simulation results reveal significant improvements in terms of latency with a gain of 47.6% and 26.1% for Digital-Analog beamforming (BF), 17.1% and 21.6% for Hybrid-Analog BF, and 24.7% and 39% for Analog-Analog BF when comparing the RL-schemes HiDQL and CDQL with the with the existent solutions, HiDQL presented a slower convergence time, however obtained a more optimal solution than CDQL. Additionally, we foresee the advantages of utilizing context-information as geo-location of the UEs to reduce the beam exploration sector, and thus improving further multi-RAT handover latency results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".