MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rodent Tracking and Abnormal Behavior Classification in Live Video using Deep Neural Networks

2022· article· en· W4320031295 on OpenAlex
Sudarsini Tekkam Gnanasekar, Svetlana Yanushkevich, Nynke J. van den Hoogen, Tuan Trang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFrame (networking)Artificial neural networkTracking (education)OpioidArtificial intelligenceComputer visionNeuroscienceAudiologyMedicinePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is focused on developing tools to assess behavioral activity in neonatal mice undergoing opioid withdrawal. Opioids are used to manage pain in both young and old, but debilitating withdrawal symptoms can occur when opioid medications are stopped. We propose to apply various pre-trained neural network models such as ResNet, MobileNet, and EfficientNet to track mice behavior in live video using the DeepLabCut package. We track the animal by detecting movement and positioning of the “nose”, “right ear”, “left ear” and “tail base” in each video frame. Tracking is a prerequisite to detecting the abnormal behavior observed during precipitated withdrawal. We compare the performance of the different pretrained models in terms of accuracy. The highest accuracy that we achieved under abnormal conditions-opioid withdrawal using ResNet_50 was 95.82%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it