MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320057096 · doi:10.1210/jcemcr/luac035

The Elusive Neuroendocrine Tumor: Finding the Ectopic ACTH Source 16 Years After the Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome

2022· article· en· W4320057096 on OpenAlexaff
Galina Smushkin, Richard Odame Phillips, Guillaume Chaussé

Bibliographic record

VenueJCEM Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCushing syndromeEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ectopic adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) syndrome (EAS) accounts for the minority of cases of Cushing syndrome. Up to 20% of these cases remain occult, despite multiple imaging attempts to localize the ACTH-producing tumor. Here we describe long-term follow-up of a 41-year-old woman, with ectopic Cushing syndrome initially classified as occult due to negative localization studies, who had bilateral adrenalectomy to manage hypercortisolism. After 16 years and many computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging scans, Octreoscans, and 2 exploration surgeries for false positives on imaging, the source of ectopic ACTH production was localized in the pancreas utilizing molecular imaging with gallium-68 somatostatin receptor-targeted positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. She underwent a distal pancreatectomy, and pathology confirmed a 1.7-cm well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with a moderately strong reactivity to ACTH stain. This case demonstrates the utility of multiple functional imaging modalities in resolving these "cold cases" of occult ectopic Cushing syndrome and the importance of a timely management of hypercortisolism with bilateral adrenalectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCEM Case ReportsSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207