MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320057625 · doi:10.21608/asalexu.2022.280355

Effect of Kegel versus Pelvic Rocking Exercise on Primary Dysmenorrhea Intensity among Adolescents at Secondary Female's Schools in al-Mafraq Jordanian city

2022· article· en· W4320057625 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria Scientific Nursing Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsNorthern College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical therapyMedicineIntensity (physics)Primary (astronomy)PsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Dysmenorrhea “painful menstruation” Common disorder that influence females’ daily life activities”, Kegel and pelvic rocking exercise have been used to reduce primary dysmenorrhea. Aim:this study aimed to compare the effect of Kegel versus pelvic rocking exercise on primary dysmenorrhea intensity among adolescents at secondary female’s schools in al-Mafraq Jordanian city. Design: A quasi –experimental research design. Setting: This study was carried out at three governmental secondary schools at Al-Mafraq Jordan city. Subject: A convenient sample of 216 student with dysmenorrheal were recruited. They are randomly, assigned into two groups (Kegel1& Pelvic rocking exercise2). Tools: Data was collected through three tools, basic data structured Interview schedule, WALIDD primary dysmenorrhea intensity scale and retrospective associative symptom scale (RSS)). Results: Mean age of the studied sample was (17.11 ± 0.84 &17.11 ± 0.84) years old in both studied groups respectively. Inaddition, 77.7 % of group 1 and 66.7% of group 2 suffered from severe dysmenorrhea while 25.9 % & 33.3% respectively had moderate dysmenorrhea. After 8 weeks became mild in 48.15, moderate in 36.9% and only 15.75 sever in group 1 while group 2 became mild in 3.7%, moderate 74.1% and severe 22.2%, effect size indicate mild relation among group 1 (0.486) and low in group 2 (0.250 ).while associative symptoms was moderate in two thirds (65.7% and 58.3%) of both groups before intervention, after 8 weeks were significant in posttest p (0.024) became 100% mild in group 1 while 95.4% in group 2 .the effect size moderate in both groups favor to group 1 (0.745 & 0.522 ) respectively .Conclusion: this study concluded that exercise significantly reduced intensity of primary dysmenorrhea. Recommendations: Kegel exercise technique should be advocated as a non-pharmacological approach for management of primary dysmenorrhea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it