MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320063603 · doi:10.1145/3559009.3569675

VoxelCache

2022· article· en· W4320063603 on OpenAlexaff
Sankeerth Durvasula, Raymond Kiguru, Samarth Mathur, Jenny Xu, Jimmy Lin, Nandita Vijaykumar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBottleneckLeverage (statistics)Simultaneous localization and mappingVoxelVisualizationSpeedupRobotArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)Mobile robotEmbedded systemParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time 3D mapping is a critical component in many important applications today including robotics, AR/VR, and 3D visualization. 3D mapping involves continuously fusing depth maps obtained from depth sensors in phones, robots, and autonomous vehicles into a single 3D representative model of the scene. Many important applications, e.g., global path planning and trajectory generation in micro aerial vehicles, require the construction of large maps at high resolutions. In this work, we identify mapping, i.e., construction and updates of 3D maps to be a critical bottleneck in these applications. The memory required and access times of these maps limit the size of the environment and the resolution with which the environment can be feasibly mapped, especially in resource constrained environments such as autonomous robot platforms and portable devices. To address this challenge, we propose VoxelCache: a hardware-software technique to accelerate map data access times in 3D mapping applications. We observe that mapping applications typically access voxels in the map that are spatially co-located to each other. We leverage this temporal locality in voxel accesses to cache indices to blocks of voxels to enable quick lookup and avoid expensive access times. We evaluate VoxelCache on popularly used mapping and reconstruction applications on both GPUs and CPUs. We demonstrate an average speedup of 1.47X (up to 1.66X) and 1.79X (up to 1.91X) on CPUs and GPUs respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.149
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207