MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320065620 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.p-0222

Exposure to Household Air Pollution (HAP) and measures of central hemodynamic parameters among Bangladeshi population- A cross-sectional study.

2022· article· en· W4320065620 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Shahriar, Mahbubul Eunus, Shyfuddin Ahmed, Muhammad Ashique Haider Chowdhury, Shirmin Bintay Kader, Bilkis Begum, Rabab Shams, Golam Sarwar, Dewan S Alam, Faruque Parvez, Rubhana Raqib, Habibul Ahsan, Mohammad Yunus

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureHemodynamicsConfoundingPopulationPulse pressureCross-sectional studyDemographyCardiologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Household Air Population (HAP) has been linked to an array of adverse health hazards, including cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. We have assessed whether household air pollution (HAP) is associated with hemodynamic parameters as part of the Bangladesh Global Environmental and Occupational Health (GEO Health) project. We assessed central hemodynamic parameters-Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Heart rate (HR) using a standard cuff sphygmomanometer (Omron) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Pulse Pressure (PP) using the standard formula. The exposures to particulate matter < 2.5µm (PM2.5) and Black Carbon (BC) from biomass fuel were measured for 24 hours using a personal monitor, RTI MicroPEM (RTI International, NC), among healthy, non-smoking women (n=400) and men (n=200). A multiple linear regression model adjusted for potential confounders was used to examine the association between HAP exposures and hemodynamic outcomes. The average 24-hour PM2.5 concentration was 167.7 μgm-3 for females and 98.0μgm-3 for males. The average 24-hour concentration of BC was 14.1μgm-3 for females and 10.3μgm-3 for males. In the adjusted multivariable regression model, an 1% increase in BC resulted in a 1.6 mm of Hg reduction in MAP (95% CI: -3.24, -.03 mm of Hg, P=0.04), 2.8 mm of Hg increase in PP (95% CI: 1.55, 4.22 mm of Hg, P=0.00) and 2.6 mm of Hg reduction in DBP (95% CI: -4.09, -1.10 mm of Hg, P=0.00). No association was observed between BC and SBP as well as BC and HR. PM2.5 was not associated with any of the hemodynamic parameters even after adjusting for age, cooking duration, household income, and Body mass index (BMI). This population-based study provides evidence that exposure to HAP (BC) is linked with central hemodynamic parameters, especially MAP and PP, which have negative implications for cardiovascular health when they become high and low. HAP, Hemodynamics, Bangladesh

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207