MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320065775 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.p-0262

The Impact of Residential Greenness on Psychological Distress among Hurricane Katrina Survivors

2022· article· en· W4320065775 on OpenAlexaff
Kate Burrows, Kelvin C. Fong, Sarah R. Lowe, Elisabeth Fussell, Michelle L. Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Green Space and Health
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthSocioeconomic statusDemographyPoison controlDistressEnvironmental healthPsychological resilienceInjury preventionSuicide preventionOccupational safety and healthPsychologyMedicineGeographyGerontologyPopulationPsychiatryClinical psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keywords: green space, mental health, disasters, extreme weather Background: Hurricanes are potentially traumatic events that can produce long-lasting health issues for survivors. Research shows that neighborhood-level social features, such as social and economic capital, are associated with lower risk of mental disorders among survivors. However, to our knowledge, there is no work assessing the impact of neighborhood-level environmental features, such as greenness. We hypothesize that, like community social features, the salutary effects of environmental features may modify recovery among disaster-affected populations. Methods: We used data from the Resilience in Survivors of Katrina Study, a cohort assembled in 2004-2005 (time 0 [T0]) of low-income parents in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, most of whom later experienced Hurricane Katrina. We obtained data on psychological distress (Kessler [K]-6 scores), sociodemographics, and hurricane exposure for 214 participants who were interviewed again in 2006-2007 (T1) and in 2016-2018 (T2). We assessed greenness using average growing season Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in 300-m buffers around participants’ homes at each timepoint and estimated neighborhood concentrated disadvantage (a common composite metric for neighborhood-level socioeconomic status) at the Census tract-level. We assessed the impact of residential greenness on psychological distress among Katrina survivors using adjusted linear regressions with sandwich clustering. Results: Preliminary results found that residential greenness was not significantly associated with distress at any time point. However, moving to a greener neighborhood immediately after Katrina (T1) was associated with a reduction in K6 scores, indicating lessened psychological distress (-1.43 [95% CI: -2.82, -0.04]) compared to moving to a neighborhood with the same or lower greenness. We found similar but non-significant associations at T2. Discussion: In this disaster-affected population, moving to a greener neighborhood was associated with reduced psychological distress in the short term. These findings suggest that neighborhood environmental features may provide temporary health benefits for disaster survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicUrban Green Space and HealthFrench-language works237,207