MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320065835 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.p-1170

Why are Silica Dust Exposures and Silica-Related Health Effects Still a Global Concern?

2022· article· en· W4320065835 on OpenAlexaff
David F. Goldsmith, Keven Hedges

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsEngineers Without Borders Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicosisPneumoconiosisEnvironmental healthCoal dustLung cancerMedicineCoalInternal medicinePathologyWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and aim Epidemiology studies of workers exposed to silica dust demonstrate that crystalline SiO2 is a multipotential hazard. Research among construction workers, miners, ceramic and brick workers, countertops workers, and sandblasters where respirable silica dust levels has been measured has demonstrated excess risk for silicosis, cor pulmopale, silica-tuberculosis (SiTB), several chronic respiratory conditions, coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP), several auto-immune diseases, and cancers of the lung and gastro-intestinal tract. Methods Despite knowledge of these links over the past decades, occupational and environmental health professionals have not been able to address three new silica-related health issues. They are silicosis and CWP among US coal miners, severe silicosis and auto-immune ailments among countertop workers; and ongoing risk for SiTB among Africa miners. The author examined the literature for other novel silica-related health risks. Results Current workers and their managers seem to not have sufficient awareness of the occupational hazards of silica dust. There are new silica dust concerns including fracking sand, railroad ballast, and dust control in countertop machining. There are new cancer links with silica, including women and nonsmokers with excess lung cancer; excess lung cancer among patients with CWP; children’s dust exposure in small-scale gold mining; and excess lung diseases and pulmonary cancer among railroad workers. There is need for research on improved silica sampling techniques and protective gear. Pathologists should explore whether silicosis leads to differences in cell characteristics that produce silica-linked lung cancers compared to ‘garden variety’ malignancies. Conclusion Despite promises that global silica problems were controlled, that seems to be countered by excesses of CWP and SiTB that still bedevil the occupational medicine and public health communities. We need more worker education, prevention or regulatory policy, and basic silica biology and pathology to effectively intervene. Keywords Silica health effects, future prevention efforts; improved sampling methods

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207