Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brandon Daniel-Hughes teaches religion and philosophy at John Abbott College in Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec. He is the author of Pragmatic Inquiry and Religious Community: Charles Peirce, Signs, and Inhabited Experiments (Routledge, 2018). His current research focuses on religious naturalism and the American pragmatist tradition. He also grows vegetables and brews beer.Roger Ward is professor and chair of philosophy at Georgetown College (KY). He is editor of the Pluralist, the journal of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy. Ward focuses on the intersection of pragmatism and religion. His most recent book is Pierce and Religion: Knowledge, Transformation and the Reality of God (Lexington Books 2018).Michael L. Raposa is Professor of Religion Studies and the E. W. Fairchild Professor of American Studies at Lehigh University. He is the author of four books: Peirce's Philosophy of Religion (Indiana, 1989), Boredom and the Religious Imagination (Virginia, 1999), Meditation and the Martial Arts (Virginia, 2003), and Theosemiotic: Religion, Reading, and the Gift of Meaning (Fordham, 2020). Raposa has published numerous articles focused on the thought of Charles S. Peirce and the relevance of pragmatism for contemporary religious thought.Dr. Leon Niemoczynski's research focuses mainly on the philosophy of nature, especially within the Continental and American philosophical traditions. He also maintains interests in a diverse range of topics including philosophical naturalism and philosophical ecology, logic and metaphysics, German idealism, ancient Greek philosophy, aesthetics, animal ethics, phenomenology and hermeneutics, and the philosophy of religion. Philosophers most relevant to his current research include Plato, Hegel, Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Deleuze, and Merleau-Ponty.Rory Misiewicz (Ph.D., Princeton Theological Seminary) teaches humanities at Coventry Christian Schools in Pottstown, PA. He is the author of The Analogy of Signs: Rethinking Theological Language with Charles S. Peirce (Lexington Books, 2021) and has published in the American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, The International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, and the Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. His work focuses on the relation between philosophical theology, semiotics, and pragmatism.Gary Slater is a Humboldt Fellow based at the University of Münster, Germany. With a background in theology and in C.S. Peirce, he writes on theological ethics and pragmatist philosophical theology. His first book, C.S. Peirce and the Nested Continua Model of Religious Interpretation (OUP, 2015) developed resources in Peirce's work for these fields. His current book project looks at Pope Francis’ integral ecology as a culturally creative response to the integrated challenge of ecological displacement and forced migration. He is editor of the American Journal of Theology and Philosophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.556 | 0.502 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".