Mélanie LeBlanc (2021), Dans l’accent de la Baie : se construire Acadien dans le sud-Ouest de la Nouvelle-Écosse, Sudbury, Éditions Prise de parole, coll. "Agora", 362 p. [ISBN : 978-2-8974-4275-0]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Dans notre environnement en constant mouvement, se poser la question "qui suis-je ?" relève de \nconstructions et de déconstructions venant de nos positionnements singuliers dans différentes \nsphères sociales. Dans le contexte canadien fondé sur la dualité linguistique (français et anglais), il est \npertinent de se questionner sur le lien entre la construction identitaire et le rapport à la langue. Mais \ndans quelle langue ? Le français demeure une langue minoritaire et il existe une grande variation de \nla langue française dans tout le pays. La francophonie au Canada est plurielle. Elle est majoritaire au \nQuébec (seule province unilingue francophone au Canada) et d’importance au Nouveau-Brunswick \n(seule province bilingue), mais partout ailleurs dans le pays, nous pouvons observer des "systèmes \nécolinguistiques singuliers marqués par différentes "manières d’être francophones" (Remysen, \n2019 : 15). [...]"
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".