Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The present research paper attempts to explore the archetypical elements in the works of Indo-Canadian author Rohinton Mistry. As a member of a racial minority, Rohinton Mistry’s work strive to put forward the lives, beliefs, culture and practices of his community, whose members are now limited to a few. The Parsee community stands tall in terms of cultural and racial preservation against the storms and sands of time. With hardly any significant number of inter-caste marriage associations, this race is considered to be one of the purest among the lot. Genetic Studies over the past years have shown that the purity of their lineage is still maintained. As such they are still as closer to their forefathers as they were in 7th Century before migration. Their racial closeness to the human beings several centuries back proves cultural preservation over time and space. Thus, the cultural archetypes transferred from generation to generation through unconscious effort of collective unconscious, invariably find manifestation in the literature from this community. Archetypal figures and myths can be easily traced in the works of Rohinton Mistry. In a sense, an obvious result of preservation of culture is preservation of these cultural archetypes. And this will constitute the subject matter of the present study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".