Supraspinal facilitation of nociception by glutamatergic innervation from the retrosplenial cortex to anterior cingulate cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is critical for pain perception; while the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) plays an important role in navigation and memory. It is known that RSC projects to ACC, less is known about the function of this projection. Here we used integrative approaches to show that there is direct excitatory glutamatergic projections from the RSC to the ACC, and postsynaptic excitatory responses are mediated by AMPA receptors. Activation of RSC-ACC by optogenetics significantly facilitated behavioral responses to nociceptive stimuli (mechanical and thermal) in freely moving mice. By contrast, spinal nociceptive tail-flick and anxiety-like activities were not affected. Our results suggest that RSC to ACC projection preferentially affects nociceptive process in supraspinal cortical region. Our results have identified a new facilitatory cortico-cortical circuit for sensory nociceptive process, and this pathway serves to link memory ‘engram’ to pain perception in humans and animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".