Interactomes of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Isoforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functional differentiation of the two isoforms of the protein-serine/threonine kinase, glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), is an unsettled area of research. The isoforms are highly similar in structure and are largely redundant, though there is also evidence for specific roles. Identification of isoform-specific protein interactors may elucidate the differences in function and provide insight into isoform-selective regulation. We therefore sought to identify novel GSK-3 interaction partners and to examine differences in the interactomes of the two isoforms using both affinity purification and proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID) mass spectrometry methods. While the interactomes of the two isomers are highly similar in HEK293 cells, BioID in HeLa cells yielded a variety of preys that are preferentially associated with one of the two isoforms. DCP1B, which favored GSK-3α, and MISP, which favored GSK-3β, were evaluated for reciprocal interactions. The differences in interactions between isoforms may help in understanding the distinct functions and regulation of the two isoforms as well as offer avenues for the development of isoform-specific strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".