MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320519641 · doi:10.1017/9781846159442.011

Akwesasne – Where the Partridges Drum to Fort Drum: Consultation with Native Communities, an Evolving Process

2011· other· en· W4320519641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francis Scardera

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)RepatriationDrumProcess (computing)PalimpsestResource (disambiguation)Political scienceHistorySociologyBusinessPsychologyPublic relationsArchaeologyComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The consultation process between a native community and any DoD installation is often accompanied by a palimpsest of discussions where concerns are aired, reassurances are sought, and, when conditions permit, a working protocol is established. From cordial visits and the sharing of information to the more tenuous process of repatriation of ancestral remains, the challenges remain. However, a continuum based on trust, meaningful dialogue, access to archaeological sites and the stewardship provided by on-site, trained cultural resource managers, form the basis of an effective consultation model evolving on Fort Drum. Fort Drum, the 10th Mountain Division Military Installation, is located in Jefferson and Lewis Counties, New York. The base, located approximately 50 kilometres south of the Canadian border and 15 kilometres east of Lake Ontario, has been actively used for military training since 1908. Today, the base trains and mobilises almost 80,000 troops annually (DOIM 2008). In addition to the military activity, Fort Drum is also home to over 800 archaeological sites, and the number of discoveries continues to rise with each new field season. Under the auspices of Dr Laurie Rush, the primary objective of the Fort Drum Cultural Resources Program is to identify and protect archaeological sites located on the base that are potentially eligible for the National Register. The program also coordinates and encourages consultation between Fort Drum and federally recognised tribes with ancestral ties to the area, and continues to develop a community outreach program to sensitise both military and civilian personnel to the rich heritage present on the base (Rush and Wagner 2008). In some cases, geographical proximity or cultural affiliations may require the participation of several native communities. For almost a decade, Dr Laurie Rush has been consulting with three members of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy: the St Regis Mohawk Tribe, the Oneida Indian Nation of New York, and the Onondaga Nation. Furthermore, the uniqueness of the political/cultural complexities of each community must also be considered, particularly when inviting representatives and sharing information. For example, Akwesasne (the place where the partridges drum), a Mohawk reservation recognised by both the Canadian and American governments, straddles the political boundaries of three jurisdictions, including the provinces of Ontario and Quebec, as well the counties of St Lawrence and Franklin in the state of New York.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0370.014
Scholarly communication0.0160.012
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207