Interregional phase-amplitude coupling between theta rhythm in the nucleus tractus solitarius and high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus during REM sleep in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) between theta and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) is predominant during active wakefulness, REM sleep and behavioral and learning tasks in rodent hippocampus. Evidence suggests that these state-dependent CFCs are linked to spatial navigation and memory consolidation processes. CFC studies currently include only the cortical and subcortical structures. To our knowledge, the study of nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS)-cortical structure CFC is still lacking. Here we investigate CFC in simultaneous local field potential recordings from hippocampal CA1 and the NTS during behavioral states in freely moving rats. We found a significant increase in theta (6-8 Hz)-HFO (120-160 Hz) coupling both within the hippocampus and between NTS theta and hippocampal HFOs during REM sleep. Also, the hippocampal HFOs were modulated by different but consistent phases of hippocampal and NTS theta oscillations. These findings support the idea that phase-amplitude coupling is both state- and frequency-specific and CFC analysis may serve as a tool to help understand the selective functions of neuronal network interactions in state-dependent information processing. Importantly, the increased NTS theta-hippocampal HFO coupling during REM sleep may represent the functional connectivity between these two structures which reflects the function of the hippocampus in visceral learning with the sensory information provided by the NTS. This gives a possible insight into an association between the sensory activity and REM-sleep dependent memory consolidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".