Evolution of Bosniak IIF Renal Cysts and Impact of the 2019 Bosniak Classification. Reply.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyReply to Letters to the Editor14 Feb 2023Clinical Outcomes of Bosniak IIF Renal Cysts and Impact of the 2019 Bosniak Classification. Reply.is a reply to letterEvolution of Bosniak IIF Renal Cysts and Impact of the 2019 Bosniak Classification. Letter. Patrick O. Richard and Felix Couture Patrick O. RichardPatrick O. Richard * E-mail Address: [email protected] Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author and Felix CoutureFelix Couture Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003366AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Clinical Outcomes of Bosniak IIF Renal Cysts and Impact of the 2019 Bosniak Classification. Reply.." The Journal of Urology, Publish Ahead of Print, pp. – REFERENCES 1. . Evolution of Bosniak IIF renal cysts and impact of the 2019 Bosniak classification. J Urol.2023; 209(5):000-000. Link, Google Scholar 2. . Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol.2017; 198(1):12-21. Link, Google Scholar 3. . Proportion of malignancy in Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019 (v2019) classes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol.2022; 33(2):1307-1317. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4. . Outcomes of Bosniak classification version 2019 class IIF cystic renal masses at imaging surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol.2022. Crossref, Google Scholar Submitted February 2, 2023; accepted February 3, 2023; published 000. © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology14 Feb 2023Evolution of Bosniak IIF Renal Cysts and Impact of the 2019 Bosniak Classification. Letter. Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Patrick O. Richard Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada * E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Felix Couture Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Submitted February 2, 2023; accepted February 3, 2023; published 000. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".