Long-term Bowel function and pediatric health-related quality of life after transanal rectal mucosectomy and partial internal anal sphincterectomy pull-through for Hirschsprung Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to define controlled outcomes for bowel function and quality of life (QoL) after transanal rectal mucosectomy and partial internal anal sphincterectomy pull-through (TRM-PIAS, A modified Swenson procedure) for Hirschsprung disease (HD). Background: We have previously shown that a novel modification of transanal rectal mucosectomy and partial internal anal sphincterectomy (TRM-PIAS, A modified procedure) for Hirschsprung disease have the advantage of low postoperative Hirschsprung associated enterocolitis. The controlled long-term follow-up studies evaluating Bowel Function Score (BFS) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQoL, age <18 years) remain unclear. Methods: Between Jan 2006 and Jan 2016, 243 Patients underwent TRM-PIAS older than 4 years were included, while experienced redo surgery because of complication were excluded. Patients were compared with age- and gender-matched 244 healthy children each randomly selected from the 405 general population. The enrollee was investigated for questionnaires on BFS and PedsQoL. Results: < 0.05), and no significantly different in fecal accidents, constipation and social problems. With advancing age, the total BFS of HD patients improved, with a tendency close to the normal level beyond 10 years old. But, after grouped according to presence or absence of HAEC, the non-HAEC group experienced more dramatic improvement with age increasing. Conclusions: Compared with matched peers, significant impairment of fecal control prevails after TRM-PIAS in HD patients, but bowel function improve with age and recovery faster than conventional procedure. It should be emphasized that post-enterocolitis is a high-risk factor for delayed recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".