MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320712908 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3244689

An Integrated Framework for BIM Development of Concrete Buildings Containing Both Surface Elements and Rebar

2023· article· en· W4320712908 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongming Xiang, Ge Ou, Abbas Rashidi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRebarGround-penetrating radarComputer sciencePhotogrammetryBuilding information modelingRemote sensingRadarArtificial intelligenceEngineeringGeologyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As-built Building Information Models (BIM) are increasingly used to facilitate the management of all aspects of built infrastructure’s life cycle. Existing studies mainly focus on automating as-built BIM development for surface elements but often ignore embedded elements such as rebar due to the inaccessibility with typical sensing devices, such as image-based or time-of-flight-based methods. To tackle the issue, this research utilizes Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) together with the photogrammetry method to generate BIMs for in- service buildings considering both surface elements (e.g., column, slab, wall, etc.) and rebar. As the first step, as-built BIM for surface elements is generated and then existing rebar is identified by using GPR. A calibration label is designed and attached to elements which are scanned by GPR device, and a series of images are captured from those elements and then used with other images to generate point clouds. Faster RCNN is then utilized to recognize labels among all images. Next, an inverse photogrammetry approach is deployed to identify the scanned elements in BIM. By matching the recorded timestamps of GPR data and labeled images, links between the rebar in GPR data and elements in BIMs are successfully established. Finally, IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) is developed to generate as-built BIM models. Six case studies demonstrate that the system is capable of automatically developing as-built BIM, while embedded rebar could be efficiently localized and projected into corresponding elements in BIM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207