MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320726968 · doi:10.1007/s10641-023-01397-y

A revised taxonomy and estimate of species diversity for western North American Lampetra

2023· article· en· W4320726968 on OpenAlexaff
Kellie J. Carim, Douglas C. Larson, J. M. Helstab, Michael K. Young, Margaret F. Docker

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Biology of Fishes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersU.S. Forest Service
KeywordsLampetraCladeLineage (genetic)Phylogenetic treeBiologyEvolutionary biologyGeographyCytochrome bGenetic diversityGene flowZoologyTaxonEcotypeTaxonomy (biology)EcologyLampreyGenetic variationFisheryPopulationGeneDemographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lampreys are an ancient lineage of jawless fish for which the relationships among some lineages are uncertain. We addressed these information gaps for Lampetra species with a focus on western North America. Phylogenetic analysis using all publicly available sequences of two mitochondrial genes—cyt b and COI—supported designation of western North American Lampetra as a distinct genus from Lampetra in Europe, Asia, and eastern North America. Species delimitation analysis of cyt b sequences identified seven species, only three of which are currently recognized. Lampetra ayresii and L. richardsoni, regarded as separate under the “paired species concept,” were not genetically distinct; we recommend synonymizing L. richardsoni with L. ayresii because the latter has precedence, yet continuing to recognize each ecotype using its current common name. Other than the widespread L. ayresii clade, all other species exhibited limited ranges often restricted to one or two locations. Within headwaters of the Willamette River, L. ayresii demonstrated strong genetic structure and lack of gene flow among subbasins, indicating that the subbasin scale may represent an appropriate management unit. However, the appropriate management scale in other areas may differ based on evolutionary histories and gene flow. Subsequent work is needed across western North America to better delineate the ranges of the aforementioned species and to evaluate whether other unrecognized taxa in this lineage may be present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Biology of FishesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207