MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4320803575 · doi:10.1017/9781580468411.013

“In Quebec people die easily” (1983–)

2014· other· en· W4320803575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bob Gilmore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeDie (integrated circuit)Art historyArtHistoryLawPolitical scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tragic news first became public in Quebec in a notice in the Journal de Montréal on Sunday, March 13, 1983. Under the title “Claude Vivier Strangled,” the paper reported: The composer of music Claude Vivier, 35 years old [correctly, 34], originally from Montreal, was discovered strangled, yesterday afternoon in his Paris apartment where he had been living for less than a year…. Alerted by friends who had not heard from the victim for several days, the police gained entry to the apartment after breaking through the door. They discovered the dead body of the composer in his room, strangled under a mattress. The apartment had been ransacked. An obituary, by Claude Gingras, followed in La Presse the next day: “I didn’t much like his music. However it was with infinite sadness that I took out his dossier to add the last information concerning him. CLAUDE VIVIER (1948–). Now it should read: CLAUDE VIVIER (1948–1983). It’s never nice to add, in this way, the date of death to someone’s name.” A more extended and thoughtful obituary followed in Le Droit a few days later. “The inner journey can lead to precipices,” wrote the journalist J. J. Van Vlasselaer. “This XXIst century Romantic, like all true Romantics, took risks in order to find himself. So the absurd hands of a vicious strangler have stifled one of the musical glories of our country.” To his friends, almost as upsetting as the news of his murder was the thought that Vivier’s body had lain undiscovered in his apartment for more than four days before the Paris police had forced entry. As the full picture slowly began to emerge, the real tragedy of his death became all the more apparent. And while the events of the night of March 7–8, 1983, are straightforward to describe, aspects of their interpretation have unleashed a controversy that has raged ever since, and will perhaps never be satisfactorily resolved. On the night of Monday, March 7, Vivier was drinking in a bar—which has never been reliably identified—in the Belleville neighborhood, not far from his apartment on rue du Général-Guilhem. He found himself attracted to a young man there and invited him home for the night.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth, Medicine and Society→French-language works237,207→