MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320805920 · doi:10.1364/aoipm.1994.wpl.58

Theory of Multiple-Light-Scattering Spectroscopy

2022· article· en· W4320805920 on OpenAlexaff
Sajeev John

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Optical Imaging and Photon Migration · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an algorithm for determining the dielectric autocorrelation function of a disordered medium from angle resolved multiple light scattering measurements. Photons propagating in a disordered, multiple scattering medium are classified as being either ballistic, “snake-like” or diffusive, depending on the nature of their trajectory between source and detector. Considerable information about the nature of the scattering medium is contained in the early arriving snake-like photons whereas this information is smeared in the late-arriving diffusive photons. We derive from first principle a formal mathematical description which encompasses all three regimes of transport and relates the experimentally observed light intensity correlation functions to the ensemble averaged autocorrelation function <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="eq1" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˜</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mi>y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≡</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>〈</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mi>y</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>〉</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>ens</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for a disordered medium with dielectric constant <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="eq2" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Optical Imaging and Photon MigrationSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207