High-resolution assessment of multidimensional cellular mechanics using label-free refractive-index traction force microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT A critical requirement for studying cell mechanics is three-dimensional (3D) assessment of cellular shapes and forces with high spatiotemporal resolution. Traction force microscopy (TFM) with fluorescence imaging enables the measurement of cellular forces, but it is limited by photobleaching and a slow 3D acquisition speed. Here, we present refractive-index traction force microscopy (RI-TFM), a high-speed volumetric technique that simultaneously quantifies the 3D morphology and traction force of cells. RI-TFM reconstructs a 3D tomogram of single cells on a planar hydrogel elastomer using a high-speed illumination scheme with 0.5-Hz temporal resolution. This allows for quantitative analyses of 3D dry-mass distributions and shear (in-plane) and normal (out-of-plane) tractions of single cells on the extracellular matrix without labelling. When combined with a constrained total variation-based deconvolution algorithm, the proposed method provides 0.55-Pa shear (in-plane) and 1.59-Pa normal (out-of-plane) traction sensitivity for a 1-kPa hydrogel substrate. We demonstrate the utility of RI-TFM by assessing the effects of compromised intracellular stress due to actin disruption or low temperature and capturing the rapid dynamics of cellular junction formation in the spatiotemporal changes in non-planar traction components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".