رباط أزدمر بمنطقة باب الوزير بالقاهرة 900-909هـ/1494-1503م دراسة آثارية معمارية مقارنة THE RIBAT OF IZDMUR IN THE BAB AL-WAZIR QUARTER AT CAIRO (900-909 H/1494-1503 CE): A COMPARATIVE ARCHITECTURAL, AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
يتناول هذا البحث دراسة لأحد العمائر الدينية فى العصر المملوكى الجركسى ، ذلك العصر الذى ازدهرت فيه حركة العمارة الإسلامية فى القاهرة ، وتطورت طرزها ، وتباينت أنماطها المعمارية والزخرفية ، وهو عبارة عن رباط يعرف باسم "رباط أزدمر" ، خُصص لإيواء الصوفية أو الفقراء وإقامتهم ، وتبرز أهمية البحث فى توضيح العلاقة بين منشأة كانت قائمة بالفعل ، تُؤَدى فيها الأغراض الوظيفية ، ممثلة فى الرباط موضع البحث ، وبناء آخر بني بجواره مباشرة ، يزخر بحشد كبير من العناصر المعمارية والزخرفية مع ضخامة فى البناء ، ممثلاً فى مجمع معمارى كبير لأحد الأمراء ، الذين كان لهم شأن كبير فى عهد السلطان قنصوه الغورى 906-922هـ/1501-1516م ، مما أدى إلى الاهتمام بتلك المجموعة البنائية ، وانحسار أهمية الرباط المعمارية والوظيفية ، وعدم ذكره فى المصادر التاريخية والدراسات العلمية الحديثة.This research spot light on one of the religious architecture in the Circassian Mamluk era when the Islamic architecture flourished in Cairo, its styles developed, and its architectural and decorative patterns varied. This religious architecture is “Ribat Azdmur”, where determined to house the poor and the sophists. The research’s importance is clarifying the relationship between a facility that already existed, represented in the Ribat, and another building built directly next to it, represented in a large architectural complex for one of the princes. These princes had a great importance during the reign of Sultan Qansuh al-Ghuri 906-922 AH / 1501-1516 AD. Thus, led to the interest in that building group, the decline in the importance of architectural and functional Ribat, and dismissing its mention in historical sources and modern scientific studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".