MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Transition from Academia to Industry as an Early Career Scientist: The Why, the How, and the What

2023· editorial· en· W4320895983 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hoda Soleymani Abyaneh

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDoctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Canadian institutionsMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)TransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransition (genetics)Engineering ethicsSociologyChemistryEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEEditorialNEXTThe Transition from Academia to Industry as an Early Career Scientist: The Why, the How, and the WhatHoda Soleymani AbyanehHoda Soleymani AbyanehMerck Canada Inc., 16750 Trans-Canada Highway, Kirkland, Quebec H9H 4M7, CanadaMore by Hoda Soleymani Abyanehhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1901-263XCite this: Mol. Pharmaceutics 2023, 20, 5, 2289–2290Publication Date (Web):February 15, 2023Publication History Received3 February 2023Published online15 February 2023Published inissue 1 May 2023https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00109https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00109editorialACS PublicationsCopyright © Published 2023 by American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views3169Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (765 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Biotechnology,Mathematical methods,Pharmaceuticals,Pharmaceutics,Students Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0200.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3780.263

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PharmaceuticsSame topicDoctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsFrench-language works237,207