MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320898602 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.782

Tractography analysis of subcallosal cingulate DBS for treatment-resistant depression using normative connectome data

2023· article· en· W4320898602 on OpenAlexaff
Ha Neul Song, Gavin J.B. Elias, Jürgen Germann, Alexandre Boutet, Andrés M. Lozano, Helen S. Mayberg, Ki Sueng Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTractographyWhite matterConnectomeHuman Connectome ProjectNeurosciencePsychologyDepression (economics)MedicineMagnetic resonance imagingFunctional connectivityRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract SCC-DBS for treatment-resistant depression has demonstrated sustained response and remission rates. SCC-DBS targeting evolved from anatomy-based to connectome-based targeting, now stimulating convergence of three (forceps minor (FM), cingulum bundle (CB), and subcortical-junction (SJ)) WM pathways, with improved clinical efficacy. However, there is response variability that might be explained by differences in white matter (WM) activation pathways. We evaluated the relationship of WM activation pathways to clinical improvement in a large cohort of patients using normative-connectome data. Based on changes in HDRS-17 defined at 1 year time point (50±32%), fifty-one patients were analyzed and divided into four groups: remitters (n=14,HDRS≤7), responders (n=16,HDRS≥50%), low-responders (n=10,HDRS=30-49%), and non-responders (n=11,HDRS<30%). After registering images of postoperative to preoperative MRI and reconstructing electrode trajectories, volumes of tissue activated were estimated using Lead-DBS software. Each group's common WM activation map was generated using normative-connectome data and compared among four groups. Additionally, locations of active contacts were analyzed in MNI. We found significant but graded WM activation differences among four groups. Remitters shared full activation of the predefined three WM pathways. Responders also shared all critical pathways, but with fewer streamlines within CB and FM than remitters. Critically, low-responders show no activation of right CB, and non-responders miss activation of both right CB and FM. We also found inconsistent locations of left and right active contacts in low and non-responders. For low-responders, right active contacts were located more anterior compared to left. On the other hand, for non-responders, right contacts were located more inferiorly than left. These findings suggest that depression recovery with SCC-DBS is dependent on precision targeting of the requisite 3 bundles. Nonresponse is most influenced by the amount of CB stimulation with additional negative impact of incomplete FM stimulation. Consistent methods for tractography-guided surgical targeting are likely required for optimal SCC-DBS outcomes. Research Category and Technology and Methods Clinical Research: 1. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Keywords: Deep Brain Stimulation, Subcallosal Cingulate, Treatment Resistant Depression

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207