MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320905462 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.339

The effect of Outpatient Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy (C-ECT) on the Readmission Risk and Total Direct Cost in Patients with Depressive, Bipolar and Psychotic Disorders: A Naturalistic Retrospective Cohort Study

2023· article· en· W4320905462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Azriel H. K. Koh, Xiaowei Tan, Mary Lou Chatterton, Donel Martin, Colleen Loo

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Assessment of FunctioningMedicineBipolar disorderElectroconvulsive therapyMontgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating ScaleBrief Psychiatric Rating ScalePartial hospitalizationRetrospective cohort studyHazard ratioSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)CohortPsychiatryRating scaleMoodEmergency medicineMajor depressive disorderInternal medicineMental healthPsychosisPsychologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The effect of continuation/maintenance ECT (C-ECT) across mood and psychotic disorders on the readmission risk and cost is unclear. Objective: To assess the association of outpatient C-ECT on the readmission risk and the total direct healthcare cost after completion of inpatient acute ECT. Methods: A naturalistic retrospective cohort study of 540 patients who received inpatient acute ECT treatment from May 2017 to Mar 2021 in a large tertiary psychiatric institution was conducted. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), EQ-5D-3L utility scale (EQ-5D), and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGIS-I) were used. After completion of inpatient acute ECT, patients receiving and not receiving outpatient C-ECT were compared using survival analysis for readmission risk. Hospitalisation and ECT treatment cost were used to calculate total direct cost. Results: After the first 6 sessions of inpatient acute ECT, both cohorts had significant improvement in their BRPS, MADRS, GAF and EQ-5D scores. Patients who continued with outpatient C-ECT after acute ECT had a significantly lower risk of readmission [adjusted hazard ratio of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49 – 0.95, p=0.022)]. Amongst patients with bipolar disorders and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, involuntary status at the index admission was associated with a lower risk of hospital readmission. Patients who received outpatient C-ECT had a significantly lower total direct cost compared to those who did not (SGD$35,259 vs SGD$61,337). Patients with mood disorders had a significantly lower inpatient ECT cost, hospitalisation cost and total direct costs in the outpatient C-ECT group compared to those without outpatient C-ECT. Conclusion: ECT is a quick and effective acute treatment for mood and psychotic disorders. Outpatient C-ECT for the treatment of mood and psychotic disorders is associated with lower readmission risks and lower healthcare costs, especially for patients with mood disorders Research Category and Technology and Methods Clinical Research: 2. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Keywords: ECT, Outpatient, Cost effectiveness, Capacity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesFrench-language works237,207