Mid-treatment adaptive planning during thoracic radiation using 68 Ventilation-Perfusion Positron emission tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four-Dimensional Gallium 68 Ventilation-Perfusion Positron Emission Tomography (68Ga-4D-V/Q PET/CT) allows for dynamic imaging of lung function. To date there has been no assessment of the feasibility of adapting radiation therapy plans to changes in lung function imaged at mid-treatment function using 68Ga-4D-V/Q PET/CT. This study assessed the potential reductions of dose to the functional lung when radiation therapy plans were adapted to avoid functional lung at the mid-treatment timepoint using volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT).MethodsA prospective clinical trial (U1111-1138–4421) was performed in patients undergoing conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A 68Ga-4D-V/Q PET/CT was acquired at baseline and in the 4th week of treatment. Functional lung target volumes using the ventilated and perfused lung were created. Baseline functional volumes were compared to the week 4 V/Q functional volumes to describe the change in function over time. For each patient, 3 VMAT plans were created and optimised to spare ventilated, perfused or anatomical lung. All key dosimetry metrics were then compared including dose to target volumes, dose to organs at risk and dose to the anatomical and functional sub-units of lung.Results25 patients had both baseline and 4 week mid treatment 68Ga-4D-V/Q PET/CT imaging. This resulted in a total of 75 adapted VMAT plans. The HPLung volume decreased in 16/25 patients with a mean of the change in volume (cc) −28 ± 515 cc [±SD, range −996 cc to 1496 cc]. The HVLung volume increased in 13/25 patients with mean of the change in volume (cc) + 112 ± 590 cc. [±SD, range −1424 cc to 950 cc]. The functional lung sparing technique was found to be feasible with no significant differences in dose to anatomically defined organs at risk. Most patients did derive a benefit with a reduction in functional volume receiving 20 Gy (fV20) and/or functional mean lung dose (fMLD) in either perfusion and/or ventilation. Patients with the most reduction in fV20 and fMLD were those with stage III NSCLC.ConclusionFunctional lung volumes change during treatment. Some patients benefit from using 68Ga-4D-V/Q PET/CT in the 4th week of radiation therapy to adapt radiation plans. In these patients, the role of mid-treatment adaptation requires further prospective investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".