A Case of Anomalous Electric Field Perturbations in the Equatorial Ionosphere During Postsunset Hours: Insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During a weak geomagnetic storm (Ap = 15) on 24 December 2014, the penetration electric field perturbations over the Indian dip equatorial sector are found to be anomalous on a number of occasions during postsunset hours. The event is anomalous as the magnitude and polarity of penetration electric fields do not obey the existing paradigm. The penetration electric field perturbations are investigated using the vertical drifts derived from the CADI (Canadian Advanced Digital Ionosonde) measurements at Tirunelveli (8.7°N, 77.7°E, dip angle: 1.7°). During this event, we observed postsunset vertical drift of ∼42 m s −1 not only at 18:10 LT but also ∼36 m s −1 at ∼21:00 LT which is anomalous. Interestingly, the dawn‐dusk component of interplanetary electric field (IEFy) is relatively less (<2 mV/m) at ∼21:00 LT compared to the interval 19:30–20:30 LT (IEFy ∼3 mV/m). Despite that, the vertical drift observed over Tirunelveli is very close to zero or nominally upward during 19:30–20:30 LT. In addition, the downward drift just after 21:30 LT on this night is found to be exceptionally large (∼−60 m s −1 ). By combining vertical total electron content over the Indian sector with the OI 630.0 nm airglow intensity from Mt. Abu, chain of magnetometer and Los Alamos National Laboratory geosynchronous satellite particle measurements, it is suggested that the anomalous penetration electric field perturbations on this night arise from the effects of interplanetary magnetic field By and substorm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".