Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coherent magnon-photon coupling under the Floquet drive has been demonstrated in recent experimental measurements and theoretical calculations. In this work, we studied the Floquet-driven dissipative cavity magnonics theoretically. Our results show that the Floquet states ${d}^{(n)}$ ($n$ is integer) with dissipative coupling give rise to many level attractions in the transmission spectrum. As driving amplitude increases or driving frequency decreases, the coupling for the $n=0$ mode becomes weak while for the sideband $(n=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1)$ becomes strong due to renormalized coupling strength. When the coherent and the dissipative couplings are simultaneously present, a series of sharp dips originating from the interference of two couplings occur, in contrast to a single dip with zero damping in previous work. The modified zero-damping condition is derived for the Floquet system. Moreover, we give a generalized selection rule for coupling between Floquet states by considering the multiphoton process that has not yet been studied in previous work. Our results open up promising roads for exploring the dissipative magnon-photon coupling with the Floquet driving technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".