MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320916940 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180118

The Distribution Levels and Factors Influencing Successful Development of VOE in Trenggalek Regency-Indonesia

2023· article· en· W4320916940 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ulul Hidayah, Suci Rahmawati Prima

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)Environmental scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to identify the pattern of Village Owned Enterprise (VOE) in the Trenggalek Regency and analyze the factors affecting its success.The regency was selected as the model for other regions because it has East Java's most advanced VOE development.A quantitative approach was adopted using primary data consisting of VOE age, number of business units, number of workers, capital, turnover, profit, and VOE contribution to Village Own-source Revenue.The data was collected through questionnaires and interviews with the village government and VOE administrators.The pattern on the VOE development level was analyzed using Moran Index, while the influencing factors were determined through Geographical Weight Regression.The findings showed that the villages were grouped based on the VOE development level.The developed VOE was generally affected by age, number of business units, number of workers, turnover, profit, and contribution to Village Own-source Revenue.It was also discovered that business capital has a negative effect on the VOE success level, and a similar trend was recorded for labor in some areas.This study implies the importance of strengthening through supporting factors for the success of VOE and the formation of cooperation between villages to achieve developed VOE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207