Outcomes of Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRCIS: Ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) can be useful in decreasing the intraocular pressure (IOP) and burden of antiglaucoma medications in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG). Nevertheless, baselines IOP was an important determinant for failure. PURPOSE: To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of UCP in PACG. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with PACG who underwent UCP. The main outcome measures were IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity, and presence of complications. The surgical outcomes of each eye were classified as a complete success, qualified success, or failure based on the main outcome measures. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify possible predictors for failure. RESULTS: Sixty-two eyes of 56 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 28.81 months (±18.2). The IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications decreased from a mean of 23.03 (±6.4) mmHg and 3.42 (±0.9) to 15.57 (±6.4) mmHg and 2.04 (±1.3), respectively, in the 12 th month and to 14.22 (±5.0) mmHg and 1.91 (±1.5) in the 24 th month ( P <0.01 for all). The cumulative probabilities of overall success were 72.6±5.7% and 54.8±6.3% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. A high baseline IOP was associated with a higher risk of failure (hazard ratio=1.10, P =0.03). The most common complications were cataract development or progression (30.6%), rebound or prolonged anterior chamber reaction (8.1%), hypotony with choroidal detachment (3.2%), and phthisis bulbi (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: UCP offers reasonable 2-year IOP control and reduction of the antiglaucoma medication burden. However, counseling on possible postoperative complications is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".