One Year Results of the Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation for Refractory Glaucoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRCIS: The Preserflo MicroShunt is an effective method to achieve a satisfying intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in patients with complicated forms of glaucoma. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Preserflo MicroShunt with mitomycin C in patients with complicated glaucoma. METHODS: This prospective interventional study included all patients that underwent Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation between April 2019 and January 2021 to treat severe and therapy refractory glaucoma. The patients either suffered from primary open angle glaucoma with already failed incisional glaucoma surgery or presented severe forms of secondary glaucoma (eg, after penetrating keratoplasty or globe penetrating injury). Primary endpoint was the IOP-lowering effect and the success rate after 12 months. Secondary endpoint was the occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Complete success was defined as reaching the target IOP (>6 mm Hg and <14 mm Hg) without additional IOP-lowering medication whereas qualified success was attained with the same IOP target regardless of the medication. RESULTS: A total of 40 eyes of 38 patients were enrolled. After 12 months 85.7% of the eyes achieved complete success with an average IOP of 10.5 ± 2.0 mm Hg, without the use of glaucoma eye drops. The average IOP reduction was 58.4% from baseline. In 5 cases (12.5%) failure occurred as revisional surgery was required. CONCLUSION: The Preserflo MicroShunt for refractory glaucoma cases achieved a high complete success rate without additional medication at 1 year. Revisional surgery was needed in some cases and long-term studies are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".