Studying the connection between SF3B1 and four types of cancer by analyzing networks constructed based on published research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Splicing factor 3B subunit 1 (SF3B1) is the largest component of SF3b protein complex which is involved in the pre-mRNA splicing mechanism. Somatic mutations of SF3B1 were shown to be associated with aberrant splicing, producing abnormal transcripts that drive cancer development and/or prognosis. In this study, we focus on the relationship between SF3B1 and four types of cancer, namely myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and breast cancer (BC). For this purpose, we identified from the Pubmed library only articles which mentioned SF3B1 in connection with the investigated types of cancer for the period 2007 to 2018 to reveal how the connection has developed over time. We left out all published articles which mentioned SF3B1 in other contexts. We retrieved the target articles and investigated the association between SF3B1 and the mentioned four types of cancer. For this we utilized some of the publicly available databases to retrieve gene/variant/disease information related to SF3B1. We used the outcome to derive and analyze a variety of complex networks that reflect the correlation between the considered diseases and variants associated with SF3B1. The results achieved based on the analyzed articles and reported in this article illustrated that SF3B1 is associated with hematologic malignancies, such as MDS, AML, and CLL more than BC. We found that different gene networks may be required for investigating the impact of mutant splicing factors on cancer development based on the target cancer type. Additionally, based on the literature analyzed in this study, we highlighted and summarized what other researchers have reported as the set of genes and cellular pathways that are affected by aberrant splicing in cancerous cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.034 | 0.036 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".