Adult-onset obstructive sleep apnea and pediatric pharyngoplasty in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate adult-onset obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and related risk factors, including history of pediatric palatal/pharyngeal surgery to remediate velopharyngeal dysfunction, in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). PATIENTS/METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design and standard sleep study-based criteria, we determined presence of adult-onset OSA (age ≥16 years) and relevant variables through comprehensive chart review in a well-characterized cohort of 387 adults with typical 22q11.2 microdeletions (51.4% female, median age 32.3, interquartile range 25.0-42.5, years). We used multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for OSA. RESULTS: Of the 73 adults with sleep study data, 39 (53.4%) met criteria for OSA at median age 33.6 (interquartile range 24.0-40.7) years, indicating a minimum OSA prevalence of 10.1% in this 22q11.2DS cohort. History of pediatric pharyngoplasty (odds ratio 2.56, 95% confidence interval 1.15-5.70) was a significant independent predictor of adult-onset OSA, while accounting for other significant independent predictors (asthma, higher body mass index, older age), and for male sex. An estimated 65.5% of those prescribed continuous positive airway pressure therapy were reported as adherent. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to factors of known importance in the general population, delayed effects of pediatric pharyngoplasty may contribute to risk of adult-onset OSA in individuals with 22q11.2DS. The results support increased index of suspicion for OSA in adults with a 22q11.2 microdeletion. Future research with this and other homogeneous genetic models may help to improve outcomes and to better understand genetic and modifiable risk factors for OSA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".