16th century glazed tiles and moulds: from the excavations at the historical neighborhood of Hinter-Rossgarten in the city of Kaliningrad (Koenigsberg)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматриваются изразцы XVI в. из раскопок 2012 г. в исторической слободе Хинтер-Россгартен г. Кенигсберга (Калининграда). Проведены параллели с археологическим материалом раскопок гончарной мастерской соседней слободы Фордер-Россгартен и европейскими находками. Собранная коллекция позволяет говорить о высоком художественном и технологическом уровне мастеров-изразечников и их тесной связи с передовыми европейскими центрами. Особое место занимает комплекс изразцов, относящийся к известному в Северной Германии мастеру с инициалами «VF». Анализ материала двух слобод выявил их связь, позволяющую предположить, что какая-то группа мастеров, работавших в Фордер-Россгартене, вероятно, проживали в Хинтер-Россгартене и приносили домой часть своей продукции. The article examines 16th century glazed tiles excavated in 2012 in Koenigsberg's (Kaliningrad's) historical quarter of Hinter-Rossgarten. Parallels are drawn with the archaeological materials obtained in the excavation of the potter's shop in the adjacent neighborhood of Forder-Rossgarten, and with other finds made in Europe. The collection proves the high artistic and technological level reached by tilemakers of Koenigsberg and their close connection with advanced European centers of this craft. A special place among the finds belongs to a set of tiles made by “VF”, a tilemaker known throughout Northern Germany. A study of the materials excavated in the two neighborhoods suggests that a certain group of craftsmen worked at Forder-Rossgarten, but might have lived at Hinter-Rossgarten and brought home some of the goods they produced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".