A method for demand-accurate one-dimensional cutting problems with pattern reduction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective in the one-dimensional cutting stock problem (1D-CSP) is to minimize material costs. In practice, it is useful to focus on auxiliary objectives, one of which is to reduce the number of different cutting patterns. This paper discusses the classical integer IDCSP, where only one type of stock object is included. Meanwhile, the demands of various items must be precisely satisfied in the constraints. In other words, no overproduction or underproduction is allowed. Therefore, to solve this issue, a variable-to-constant method based on a new mathematical model is proposed. In addition, we integrate the approach with two other representative methods to demonstrate its effectiveness. Both benchmark instances and real instances are used in the experiments, and the results show that the methodology is effective in reducing patterns. In particular, in terms of the solutions to the real-life instances, the proposed approach presents a 31.93 to 37.6% pattern reduction compared to other similar methods (including commercial software).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it