Práticas educativas na homoparentalidade e o repertório comportamental de seus filhos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Negative claims about homoparenthood, especially in relation to the healthy development of children, have been made in Western society.Since the behavior of caregivers influences the behavioral repertoire of children by the way in which the interaction between them takes place and by the very model that caregivers provide to their children, this study aimed to describe which parenting practices are used by homosexuals their children's behavioral repertoire.The research also sought to verify whether homosexuality would be an important variable to determine certain parental practices or behavioral repertoire of their children.The Inventário dos Estilos Parentais, Child Behavior Checklist and socioeconomic questionnaire were used.Five families from Paraná participated in the study, composed of fathers and mothers who identified themselves as homosexuals and their respective children, totaling 20 people.The results showed that there is a tendency towards agreement in the way children and caregivers perceive the exercise of parenting.Different parenting styles were found in the families and varied behavioral repertoires in the children.The parenting style index was associated with rule-breaking behavior, attention problems, and aggressive behavior.Such data indicate the possibility that homosexuality is not a determining variable for the parenting practices used, nor for the behavioral repertoire of the child or adolescent in homoparenthood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it