MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigating Suitability of Inverse Tone Mapping for Medical Images

2023· article· en· W4321192579 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Reza Tohidypour, Yixiao Wang, Mahsa T. Pourazad, Panos Nasiopoulos, Dong-xu Zhao, Mingliang Xie, Divya Pandurang Kamat

Bibliographic record

Venue2023 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContrast (vision)Tone mappingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMedical imagingBrightnessProcess (computing)Contrast enhancementImage qualityHigh dynamic rangeDynamic rangeImage (mathematics)RadiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standard dynamic range (SDR) technology has been the foundation of medical imaging to this day, making medical images lack contrast and details. To address this issue, a feasible option before adopting high dynamic range (HDR) technology in the medical image capturing is to use inverse tone mapping (iTMO) to convert SDR images into HDR images. This approach can synthetically recover some of the information lost during the SDR capturing process and increase the contrast and overall brightness of the image. This paper is the first study that evaluates the performance of existing famous iTMOs for the medical images. In our study we used Breast Cancer Biopsy whole slide images as an example type of medical images. Our performance evaluations showed that some iTMOs achieved a significant improvement in visual quality, offering a better contrast and details, and the potential to help the accuracy at diagnosis phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2023 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207