Bibliographic record
Abstract
Josef Škvorecký and Václav Havel were among the most renowned figures of Czech culture of the second half of the 20th century. Nevertheless, their mutual relations developed when Škvorecký already lived in exile in Toronto and Havel faced Communist repressions as a spokesman of the Charta 77. When they began to cooperate on an exile edition of Havel’s plays in 1976, they had to overcome not only the obvious complications caused by the Communist regime but also the embarrassment at Havel’s parodic depiction in the character of the playwright Hejl in Škvorecký’s novel The Miracle Game (1972). Over the years, Havel gained more and more credit and respect from Škvorecký. The study presented is based on their mutual correspondence from the years 1976–1989. Primarily, it deals with their professional cooperation, yet it offers a more general perspective as well. The reader is thus given an insight into the publishing practice of the Škvoreckýs as well as into Havel’s civic and political strategies that made him an informal authority not only in dissent but also in exile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".