MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321213840 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs20221612721

Mean Pain Score Before and After Wrist Splinting for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Presenting to Orthopedic Department Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

2022· article· en· W4321213840 on OpenAlexaff
Sayed Sajjad Ali, Afaq Uddin, Muhammad Shahab, Faizan Ali Janjua, Saman Zia, Ayaz Uddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarpal tunnel syndromeMedicineWristOrthopedic surgeryMedian nerveSplint (medicine)Carpal tunnelPhysical therapySplintsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Median nerve neuropathy, often known as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), is a pathological condition that develops when the median nerve becomes entrapped within the carpal tunnel, resulting in pain, numbness, and tingling sensations. The most popular non-surgical procedure right now is splinting the wrist with a rigid splint, mainly at night and occasionally in conjunction with other therapies. Objective: To determine mean change in pain score before and after wrist splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome presenting to orthopedic department Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Methods: This Quasi Experimental Study (Uncontrolled Trial) was held in the Orthopedic Department Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar for six months duration from 5th September 2020 to 6th March 2021 after approval of synopsis. A total of 60 patients with CTS were included in the study in a consecutive manner and subjected to wrist splinting. Baseline and follow up pain scores were measured at 6th post splinting week. Results: The mean age of the sample was 42.3 + 12.8 years. While distributing the patients with regards to gender, we observed that in our study 65% of the sample was male and 35% were female gender. The mean BMI was 25.2 + 3.4kg/m2 and 13.3% of sample was diabetic. Mean use of splint / day was 5.3 + 2.2 hours and 43.3% used ibuprofen as analgesic. Mean baseline pain score of the sample was 8.9 + 0.9 and mean follow up pain score at 6th week of splint use was 4.2 + 1.5 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Wrist splinting is an effective conservative treatment for CTS in terms of significant pain relief after 6 weeks and is not dependent upon BMI, gender, diabetes or type of NSAIDs used. However, our study sample size was too small to draw conclusions there is no evidence of functional improvement after splinting. We recommend more studies (interventional) on large sample size and taking into account pain as well as functional assessment to develop future guidelines for the treatment of CTS using wrist splinting Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Splinting, diabetes, Body mass index, Pain, Visual analogue scale

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207