Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over two decades since the Good Friday Agreement was signed, social spaces remain heavily contested in Northern Ireland.On the one hand, top-down approaches toward ushering in a new spatiality for a shared future have had limited success.On the other hand, there is increasing evidence that a 'shared future' disconnected from local historical and cultural contexts is unsustainable.By studying the debates surrounding three contemporary 'shared spaces' in East Belfast-the Titanic Quarter, the proposed Naíscoil na Seolta and East Belfast GAA Clubthis paper studies why some spaces are more acceptable to the general public compared to others.At a time when recent elections suggest that the region is at the cusp of political change, this paper argues that a new spatiality with grassroots community initiatives at its core must be simultaneously imagined in Belfast. 1 Landon E. Hancock, 'The Northern Irish peace process: from top to bottom', International Studies Review 10 (2) (2008), 203-38; Jocelyn Evans and Jonathan Tonge, 'Religious, political, and geographical determinants of attitudes to Protestant parades in Northern Ireland', Politics and Religion 10 (4) (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".