MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321359849 · doi:10.31004/covit.v2i2.10779

TAHAP-TAHAP PENYUSUNAN MODUL AJAR KURIKULUM MERDEKA TINGKAT SEKOLAH

2022· article· en· W4321359849 on OpenAlexaff
Fatmawati Fatmawati, Lathifatuddini Rusdi, Ainol Mardhiah, Putri Husna, Fuady Fuady

Bibliographic record

VenueCOVIT (Community Service of Health) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocializationCurriculumPedagogyMathematics educationPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kurikulum Merdeka is initiated by Nadiem Makarim, the Minister of Education, aiming to return the authority of educational management to local governments and schools in accordance with local’s needs, capacities, and wisdom. Even though this curriculum was officially launched in February 2022, until now, teachers in Indonesia, especially teachers at SD Negeri Pertiwi, Lamgarot Aceh Besar, are still unfamiliar, especially with regard to teaching modules based on this Kurikulum Merdeka. Therefore, lecturers from several universities in Aceh were inspired to assist these teachers through a socialization and teach the teachers about the stages of preparing teaching modules. This activity aims to increase teachers’ capacity in compiling independent curriculum teaching modules so that they can focus on being learning facilitators. The method used was socialization through lectures. The results of this activity indicated that there was an increase in the knowledge and skills of SD Negeri Pertiwi, Lamgarot, Aceh Besar teachers in compiling teaching modules based on Kurikulum Merdeka. Keywords: Kurikulum Merdeka, teaching module, socialization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCOVIT (Community Service of Health)Same topicEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207