MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321359849 · doi:10.31004/covit.v2i2.10779

TAHAP-TAHAP PENYUSUNAN MODUL AJAR KURIKULUM MERDEKA TINGKAT SEKOLAH

2022· article· en· W4321359849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCOVIT (Community Service of Health) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocializationCurriculumPedagogyMathematics educationPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kurikulum Merdeka is initiated by Nadiem Makarim, the Minister of Education, aiming to return the authority of educational management to local governments and schools in accordance with local’s needs, capacities, and wisdom. Even though this curriculum was officially launched in February 2022, until now, teachers in Indonesia, especially teachers at SD Negeri Pertiwi, Lamgarot Aceh Besar, are still unfamiliar, especially with regard to teaching modules based on this Kurikulum Merdeka. Therefore, lecturers from several universities in Aceh were inspired to assist these teachers through a socialization and teach the teachers about the stages of preparing teaching modules. This activity aims to increase teachers’ capacity in compiling independent curriculum teaching modules so that they can focus on being learning facilitators. The method used was socialization through lectures. The results of this activity indicated that there was an increase in the knowledge and skills of SD Negeri Pertiwi, Lamgarot, Aceh Besar teachers in compiling teaching modules based on Kurikulum Merdeka.
 Keywords: Kurikulum Merdeka, teaching module, socialization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it