MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321369147 · doi:10.24144/2788-6018.2022.06.29

International experience of legal regulation of minors and the possibility of its implementation in the labor legislation of Ukraine

2023· article· en· W4321369147 on OpenAlex
Olena Kyselova, T.V. Shlapko, H.S. Zinchenko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical and Comparative Jurisprudence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationBusinessLawLaw and economicsPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the international experience of legal regulation of the labor of minors and identifies promising areas for improving the current labor legislation of Ukraine in the field of the work of minors. In particular, the authors studied the labor legislation of the Latvian, Lithuanian, Slovak, and Estonian Republics, Great Britain, and the provinces of Canada (Alberta and Manitoba). As you know, the regulation of the labor of minors has certain features both in Ukraine and other countries, given their physiological characteristics and lack of experience. The minimum age for employment, hazardous and prohibited types of work, working hours, wages, days off and vacations, types of work permits for minors (light types of work), and liability for violation of the requirements of labor legislation on the adoption to work and the peculiarities of ensuring the labor activity of minors. Based on the study, it was revealed that the current labor legislation of Ukraine requires the improvement of the regulation of the labor of minors in the context of social changes. Thus, the types of activities where it is allowed to use the labor of minors are not regulated; there is no definition of the term “easy work for minors,” and the possibility of labor of persons under 14 years of age is not regulated, and the legal liability of employers for violating the requirements for hiring and the specifics of the work of minors is imperfectly defined. In general, the current Labor Code of Ukraine includes provisions for the regulation of the labor of minors, consistent with the standards adopted in other countries. Also, the authors have developed directions for improving the current labor legislation of Ukraine on the labor of minors, which in the future should protect minors from ignoring employers of the fixed requirements for hiring and the characteristics of the work of such a category of persons and protect them from further violations of labor legislation, as well as help to realize the right for the work of persons under 14 years of age who seek to earn independently in certain areas of activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it