Penetrative Superplumes in the Mantle of Large Super‐Earth Planets: A Possible Mechanism for Active Tectonics in the Massive Super‐Earths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent theoretical studies suggest that the physical and rheological mantle properties in massive rocky planets fall outside conventional behaviors inferred for mantle properties at the Earth's mantle pressures. The vacancy diffusion occurring at low pressures is assumed to be followed by interstitial diffusion above ∼0.1 TPa resulting in viscosity reduction at higher pressures. In addition, the dissociation transition of MgSiO3 post‐perovskite (pPv) into new phases of minerals at 0.9 and 2.1 TPa, both with large negative Clapeyron slopes, has further impact(s) on the style of circulation in the mantle of super‐Earth planets. Further, the electronic contribution of conductivity increases exponentially with temperature at temperatures ∼5000 K and higher. We employ 3D‐controlled volume spherical convection models to explore the style of mantle circulation in large rocky super‐Earth planets with different core temperatures. Our numerical models resembling a GJ 876 d size super‐Earth reveal that due to the buffering influence of the pPv‐dissociation transition at ∼0.9 TPa, for deep mantle viscosities lower than ∼1022 Pa.s a small‐scale convective layer may develop at the top of the core‐mantle boundary (CMB). Penetrative superplumes originating from deep mantle‐layered regions can maintain the heat flux from the CMB required for the planet's geodynamo, and can survive for billions of years reaching shallow depths of the mantle without significant lateral migration. The strength of the focused penetrative superplumes that can potentially sustain surface volcanism and plate tectonics is enhanced with increasing CMB temperature, but diminished by higher rates of internal heating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".