Characteristics and Prognosis of 8p11.23-Amplified Squamous Lung Carcinomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Copy number alterations are common genetic lesions in cancer. In squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas, the most common copy-number-altered loci are at chromosomes 3q26-27 and 8p11.23. The genes that may be drivers in squamous lung cancers with 8p11.23 amplifications are unclear. METHODS: Data pertaining to copy number alterations, mRNA expression and protein expression of genes located in the 8p11.23 amplified region were extracted from various sources including The Cancer Genome Atlas, the Human Protein Atlas and the Kaplan Meier Plotter. Genomic data were analyzed using the cBioportal platform. Survival analysis of cases with amplifications compared to nonamplified cases was performed using the Kaplan Meier Plotter platform. RESULTS: , while other genes display lower levels of correlation, and still, some genes in the locus show no mRNA overexpression compared with copy-neutral samples. The protein products of most locus genes are expressed in squamous lung cancers. No significant difference in overall survival in 8p11.23-amplified squamous cell lung cancers versus nonamplified cancers is observed. In addition, there is no adverse effect of mRNA overexpression for relapse-free survival of any of the amplified genes. CONCLUSION: Several genes that are part of the commonly amplified locus 8p11.23 in squamous lung carcinomas are putative oncogenic candidates. A subset of genes of the centromeric part of the locus, which is amplified more commonly than the telomeric part, show high concomitant mRNA expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".