Effectiveness of a rapid access musculoskeletal service in rural primary care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Facing a crippling scarcity of community physiotherapists, a family doctor clinic in rural Canada collaborated with a highly skilled and experienced physiotherapist to provide rapid access to musculoskeletal (MSK) assessment for patients presenting to the doctor or practice nurses. METHODS: The physiotherapist saw six patients for 30 minutes each in a weekly session. He did an expert assessment and frequently found a home programme of exercises was the appropriate treatment with onward referral and/or investigation for more complex cases. RESULTS: Rapid access was provided in a convenient location. The alternative was a 12-15 month wait for physiotherapy at least 1 hour's drive away. Outcomes were good. The results of two audits will be presented. Practice use of lab tests and X-rays was reduced. MSK knowledge and skills of doctor and nurses was improved. DISCUSSION: We hypothesised that rapid access to a physiotherapist would lead to improved outcomes compared with the above-noted long wait times. We limited contact to two or, at most, three sessions - ideally just one - to safeguard our goal of rapid access. What we did not expect, and were very surprised to see, was the number of patients - approximately 75% of the total - who had good to excellent outcomes following one or two visits. We postulate that hard-pressed physiotherapy services need a new practice paradigm, using this community-based model. We recommend establishment of further pilot projects with very careful selection of practitioners and detailed evaluation of outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".