MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321482444 · doi:10.1080/01140671.2023.2180760

Variability and assessment of interrelationships among yield and yield‐related characters of pea accessions under the influence of high temperature

2023· article· en· W4321482444 on OpenAlexaff
Chindy Ulima Zanetta, Mohd Y. Rafii, Jaafar Juju Nakasha, Thomas D. Warkentin, Budi Waluyo, Shairul Izan Ramlee

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstSoutheast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture
KeywordsPoint of deliveryBiologyBiplotYield (engineering)AgronomyGrain yieldHorticultureTraitOvuleGenotypeBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Understanding the response and variability of pea accessions traits to high temperatures is an excellent strategy for breeding pea for heat tolerance. This research aimed to determine character variability and interrelationships among yield and yield‐related traits as responses to pea grown under daily high temperature. Ninety‐four pea accessions were grown under greenhouse conditions in Malaysia and Indonesia in the 2020–2021 season. During flowering up to the physiological maturity stage, the average daily maximum temperature was 31.6°C–32.4°C in Malaysia and 26.5°C–27.6°C in Indonesia. Heat stress reduced grain yield in Malaysia by 40% when the daily maximum temperature was above 32°C compared to yield in Indonesia. The number of seeds per pod, number of seeds per plant, filled pods per plant and number of ovules per pod were positively correlated with grain yield in Malaysia and Indonesia, respectively. A negative correlation was observed for percent aborted flower and aborted seed with grain yield. The genotype by trait biplot identified accessions B32, A19, G76, A11 and D44 as potentially promising under high‐temperature conditions with high yield supported by plant height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural ScienceSame topicGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesFrench-language works237,207