MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· book-chapter· en· W4321487541 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chrisoula Andreou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRationalityRegretPreferenceVariety (cybernetics)EpistemologyFace (sociological concept)PsychologyComputer scienceSociologyArtificial intelligencePhilosophyEconomicsSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-defeating behavior and the frustration it can cause constitute a deep and rich area of philosophical inquiry. This book synthesizes and incorporates, in part or with some modifications, a variety of my contributions, published over many years, on the demands of effective decision-making in the face of challenging choice situations that generate disorderly preferences and threaten to prompt self-defeating patterns of choice. The result is a unified, extended study of the role of rationality in accommodating certain well-grounded but disorderly preference structures while protecting us from associated self-defeating patterns of choice. The book’s introduction, first chapter, and conclusion include selections (sometimes paraphrased or modified as needed to fit my current purposes) from “Environmental Damage and the Puzzle of the Self-Torturer” (Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2006a), “Empowering Rationality” (American Philosophical Quarterly, 2020a), “There Are Preferences and Then There Are Preferences” (Economics and the Mind, 2007a), “Rationality, Regret, and Choice over Time” (Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason, 2020b), “Dynamic Choice” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017), “Sweating the Small Stuff” (Psychology Today [online], 2010), and from several of the papers mentioned below in connection with later chapters in the book. Chapter 2 is a modified version of “Self-Defeating Self-Governance” (Philosophical Issues, 2012). (As in other chapters, the modifications allowed the chapter to figure as part of a larger integrated whole and to be refined in light of relatively recent feedback.) Chapter 3 combines modified versions of “The Real Puzzle of the Self-Torturer” (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2015a) and “Cashing Out the Money-Pump Argument” (Philosophical Studies, 2016). Chapter 4 combines a modified version of “Parity, Comparability, and Choice” (Journal of Philosophy, 2015b) with modified selections from “Parity without Imprecise Equality” (Value Incommensurability, 2022). Chapter 5 is a modified version of “Incomparability and the Huge-Improvement Arguments” (American Philosophical Quarterly, 2021). Chapter 6 combines a modified version of “Better Than” (Philosophical Studies, 2019a) with modified selections from “In a Different League” (Derek Parfit’s Reasons and Persons, 2020c). Chapter 7 is a modified version of “Temptation, Resolutions, and Regret” (Inquiry, 2014a). And Chapter 8 is a modified version of “Regret, Sub-Optimality, and Vagueness” (Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition, 2019b). The book’s title is drawn from titles I’ve used for other pieces, including the title of my Psychology Today blog “Choosing Well: The Good, the Bad, and the Negligible” (2010), and the titles of my articles “Choosing Well: Value Pluralism and Patterns of Choice” (New Waves in Ethics, 2011) and “The Good, the Bad, and the Trivial” (Philosophical Studies, 2014).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6440.498

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.104 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsFrench-language works237,207