Integration of in situ Rb-Sr and in situ 40Ar/39Ar dates under diverse tectono-metamorphic scenarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
40Ar/39Ar dating has been a valuable and widely used method for dating orogenic processes such as prograde and retrograde metamorphism and brittle and ductile deformation, through the analysis of K-bearing rock-forming minerals such as white mica. The in situ 40Ar/39Ar method, in which a short wavelength laser is used to ablate an analyte and deliver the liberated Ar to a noble gas spectrometer, is particularly valuable as an approach to dating deformation or metamorphism because it allows for targeting of specific chemical and structural domains, and the mapping of intragrain age distributions. Rb-Sr dating can also be applied to K-bearing minerals because of Rb’s propensity to substitute for K. The Rb-Sr method has been under-used in recent decades because the isobaric interference between parent 87Rb and daughter 87Sr has necessitated the chemical separation of Rb from Sr via ion exchange chromatography prior to mass spectrometric analysis, and hence bulk sampling of the target analyte. New tandem mass spectrometers, in which two quadrupoles are separated by an intervening reaction chamber into which a reactive gas can be introduced, have opened up the opportunity of applying laser-based in situ sampling approaches to beta decay geochronometers, including Rb-Sr (Zack and Hogmalm, 2016).We have collected new in situ Rb/Sr data for white mica from three different tectono-metamorphic settings previously dated using the in situ 40Ar/39Ar method: recrystallization of white mica in a Paleozoic low-temperature ductile shear zone; development of multiple cleavage domains in low-temperature metamorphic rocks deformed in the Paleozoic, and; slow cooling of rocks following regional amphibolite-facies metamorphism in a Paleoproterozoic orogeny. , This allows a direct comparison between these two approaches, with the goal of exploring the functionality and utility of in situ Rb-Sr data, and testing geological interpretations based upon the in situ 40Ar/39Ar method. Our results show that the in situ Rb-Sr method is a highly complementary approach to the 40Ar/39Ar method for white mica, particularly in cases for which the target mica population has a large internal spread in Rb/Sr. allowing for the rigorous testing of assumptions and hypotheses about timing and conditions of rock cooling, deformation, and fluid events developed using 40Ar/39Ar datasets. Zack, T. and Hogmalm, K.J., 2016. Laser ablation Rb/Sr dating by online chemical separation of Rb and Sr in an oxygen-filled reaction cell. Chemical Geology, 437, pp.120-133.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".